Vaccine Proponents Go on Rampage


The story has taken on another head of steam, pitting two esteemed British medical journals at odds.



Andrew Wakefield, the doctor responsible for the small-scale study in 1998 published in medical journal The Lancet linking vaccines with a spike in autism rates has been accused of deliberately manufacturing misleading data in his research.

The study has been retracted by The Lancet, but the BMJ recently condemned the research:
The editor in chief of the BMJ, Fiona Godlee, M.D., says “the MMR scare was based not on bad science but on a deliberate fraud” and that such “clear evidence of falsification of data should now close the door on this damaging vaccine scare.”

The study is widely cited as the impetus behind the current anti-vaccine backlash and has been blamed for outbreaks of illness in children of parents reluctant to vaccinate them following the scare. The BMJ alleges that aside from drawing spurious conclusions, the data was deliberately manipulated and falsely presented:
Dr. Godlee said the BMJ and investigator Brian Deer uncovered “clear evidence of falsification” of Wakefield’s data. Godlee’s editorial states that “Wakefield altered numerous facts about the patients’ medical histories in order to support his claim to have identified a new syndrome; how his institution, the Royal Free Hospital and Medical School in London, supported him as he sought to exploit the ensuing MMR scare for financial gain; and how key players failed to investigate thoroughly in the public interest when Deer first raised his concerns.”


Copyright: arcticle: WebMD, LLC.



Original article from: http://www.inquisitr.com/94778/vaccine-autism-link-called-elaborate-fraud/


Forward this news message:

From (Your E-mail or Name):
To (Recipient E-mail):
Notes (for the recipient):
 
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and for the general purpose of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, research and / or educational purposes only. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use this material for purposes other than provided by law. You must obtain permission from the copyright owner. For more information go to:
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter9/index.html